Gosden Hill Objection

23 October 2025

Letter Submitted

The planning group of the Guildford Society Planning Group has examined the outline planning permission for the Gosden Hill site (25/P/01156) for the phased development of a residential-led mixed-use for the site in Merrow.

The Society has submitted a letter strongly objecting to the application. While The Society acknowledges the need for development to meet housing and commercial demands, the current proposal fails to align with the vision and principles outlined in the Guildford Borough Local Plan (LPSS2019) and the Strategic Development Framework Supplementary Planning Document (SPD). ​ Key concerns are summarised below:

Development Justification and Vision

The Society accepts the need for development to address housing shortages, with Guildford now required to deliver 1,155 dwellings annually. ​ However, the proposed plans deviate significantly from the LPSS2019 and SPD, which envisioned Gosden Hill as a sustainable, well-integrated, and attractive area. ​ The current proposal, with limited A3 access and poor integration with surrounding areas, fails to achieve this vision. ​

Planning and Spatial Concerns

The revised plans eliminate the two-centre approach proposed in the SPD, reversing the density layout and placing taller, high-density buildings near the A3, creating visual intrusion and undermining the "green gateway" concept. ​ The Society recommends the use of an electronic 3D model to evaluate building placement and topography. ​ Additionally, the Nuthill Farm development, adjacent to the site, raises concerns about increased traffic and its impact on housing along access routes. ​

Site Integration and Connectivity

The development creates a long cul-de-sac with limited access, primarily via the congested London Road. ​ The absence of a southwest access route, as proposed in the SPD, restricts connectivity to Merrow and Burpham and limits emergency vehicle access. ​ The Society urges reconsideration of a southwest link to support bus routes, pedestrian, and cycle access. ​

Transport Infrastructure

The transport network is inadequate:

  • Cycling: On-site cycling routes are welcomed, but off-site provisions, particularly along London Road, are unsafe and unappealing. ​
  • Bus Services: The proposed bus routes are unachievable without a southwest access corridor. ​
  • Road Access: The A3 access plans are insufficient, adding traffic to an already overloaded network. ​ The lack of a comprehensive strategy from National Highways to address A3 congestion undermines the development’s viability. ​
  • Rail Station: The decision to drop plans for a train station at Gosden Hill is short-sighted, limiting sustainable travel options and increasing car dependency. ​ The Society recommends preserving the site for future rail development. The regeneration benefits of rail stations have been highlighted in recent reports See more at this link ​

Design and Environmental Concerns

The absence of detailed design information makes it impossible to assess the quality and integration of the development. ​ The proposed "wall of buildings" along the A3 contradicts the SPD’s vision for a green gateway and raises concerns about noise, pollution, and poor design quality. ​ Additionally, the Society highlights the need to protect the ancient woodland within the Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG) area and address flood risks, particularly near the proposed road junction. ​

Utilities and Infrastructure

The Society emphasizes the need for clear, costed plans for utilities before construction begins:

  • Water: Insufficient supply for the initial phase, with undefined costs and timelines for additional capacity. ​
  • Sewage: The existing system is at full capacity, requiring off-site upgrades. ​
  • Electricity: Additional supply depends on completing the Weyside substation, with no clear timeline. ​

Construction Traffic

The proposed route for construction traffic via Merrow Lane and Old London Road is unacceptable due to its impact on local residents. ​ All construction traffic should access the site via the A3. ​

Conclusion and Recommendations

The Society concludes that the proposed development fails to meet the vision outlined in the SPD, with significant shortcomings in transport, design, and integration. ​ It calls on Guildford Borough Council to provide robust planning guidance and engage with the developer to address these issues. ​ Key recommendations include:

  • Developing a 3D model of the site. ​
  • Reconsidering the southwest access route. ​
  • Preserving the site for a future rail station. ​
  • Revising traffic models and addressing utility concerns. ​
  • Ensuring alignment with the SPD’s density, height, and massing principles. ​

The Society urges the Council to prioritise infrastructure development alongside housing to ensure Guildford’s long-term sustainability and livability. ​

Share this article

Help us make Guildford better

We want our town to be vibrant, attractive and liveable. We support development that brings a sense of place and enhances the best aspects of our town. If such aims can be embraced, we believe Guildford has the chance to lead the way in enabling sensitive and sustainable development.

Pressures for development are increasing. Planning rules are being eased. The Society’s commitment to standing up for Guildford is needed more than ever.

Support Us

Getting involved allows the society to continue its work.   We welcome new members, from every age and background.  Membership provides an opportunity for you to contribute to the continued health of the town and surrounding area, and to meet other people who care about Guildford.